Why the US Millitary are Using Video Games for Training

The debate over whether violent video games are suitable for children – or even adults – has been raging for what seems like all of eternity. Whichever side of the fence you sit on there, world militaries (Especially in the USA) have taken a special interest in the video games industry over the last decade for many reasons, some of which might not be so obvious.  

A little history 

Ever since 1992 with the release of the most controversial game of the time, Mortal Kombat, it has been argued by many that violent video games create violent people. In the modern-day where graphics are starting to become incomprehensibly detailed and gameplay starts to imitate real-life warfare, the debate has become hotter than ever, but science has pretty much firmly kept its observations in place – that there is no provable link between violence in video games and the rate of violent crimes committed in real life. 

Video games can definitely teach you some extremely useful skills. The titanic First-Person Shooter franchises “Call of Duty” and “Battlefield” are the most relevant to the military. These games aim to emulate the real-life experience of soldiers in their chosen era, and developers have become extremely proficient at it.  

Untamed realism 

With dozens of licenses to allow the use of the exact designs of genuine guns, players can receive a detailed understanding of how to correctly operate currently in-service firearms and a basic understanding of how to aim and fire, especially with controllers increasingly being designed to emulate real triggers. 

Along with this, many of these games emulate tactics used by current militaries all over the world and will often even include up-to-date use of military lingo and code. This all serves to immerse players in the game in a way that can also help new army recruits learn some of what they should expect from a real-world battlefield. a lot of people get rainbow six siege boosting to save time, but maybe it’s worth sinking those extra few hours into playing the game yourself and honing your skills if you are considering joining the military. 

Play to prepare 

Perhaps as a response to this, the US Army has been developing a video game to train new recruits. With a vertical slice available for anyone to play, this program shows that the power of modern games can be used to prepare civilians for combat, even if only in the most basic way.  

Even with games such as Spec Ops: The Line and “Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare” giving an emotive and semi-accurate depiction of PTSD and the pure horrors of combat, there is currently no way to fully prepare someone for the overwhelming atmosphere of war. With the meteoric rise of VR gaming in the last few years, this is surely going to become untrue within the next decade. 

Sound in mind and body 

Shooters aren’t the only potential training ground for the military of the future. Many tactical games, from RTS games to Tactical RPGs (Role Playing Games, not the weapon!) also aim to emulate genuine army tactics and strategies. With the ultra-real Company of Heroes allowing grand scale control of a battlefield to XCOM displaying a fantasy world with real-life special forces tactics, there are dozens of games that can help you think like a squad – or even a general. 

Even when they don’t aim to show you a real battle, these games can still get your brain ready to think like a tactician. Especially since modern military squad management programs have now started to emulate the designs of some strategy games! 


A lesser-known use of video games in the military is with the control of drones and other equipment. Military software developers are extremely resourceful, and the vast majority of drones are not controlled with a joystick and controls like in the movies. Even modern cannons are controlled electronically and piloted by someone using an Xbox One controller. 

As a result, a lot of the targeting software being developed by the US military is being designed with game controllers in mind. This means that even in the back lines of war, having a completely subconscious knowledge of how a controller feels is an invaluable asset to the US military. Even being a pro at Microsoft Flight Simulator can be a considerable factor in being hired as a drone pilot. 

As harrowing as this all might sound, a better-trained military that has fewer people on the front line is a brilliant way to ensure that as few people as possible are hurt in international disputes. Quite a funny thought when you remember that the public opinion on violent video games has been overwhelmingly negative for almost 3 decades. 

Has Vaping Actually Reduced the Number of Smokers?

Vaping was produced with the primary function to offer an alternative and healthier option to smoking as well as helping smokers to quit altogether however, in recent years it has been questioned as to whether or not vaping has actually reduced the number of smokers or not. Nowadays we see many people who have never smoked before using vapes which raises the question of whether vaping has been glamorized and actual smokers do not use vaping as a means to cut down or quit at all.

Vaping is considered safer as it removes some of the damaging chemicals that are used within cigarettes and delivers nicotine through water vapor, due to the reduction of harmful substances within the nicotine products vaping is considered by many a safer alternative that can help wean smokers off smoking altogether. However, with many smokers admitting that they tried vaping but found themselves back on cigarettes pretty quickly it may not be as effective as what was once considered. The vaping industry as a whole has definitely reduced the number of smokers but it would be naive to think that it is just those who were previously cigarette smokers who use vapes, vaping itself has become quite harmful as we are seeing more and more people starting out on an electric cigarette which could lead to real smoking in the future.


Is Vaping Really Effective?

The great thing about vaping is that it can be customized to suit your needs, with different nicotine levels and flavors to suit any taste you can definitely find a great smoking alternative. However the question of whether vaping is a useful tool in quitting smoking is another thing, many smokers say that they find it hard to come off nicotine products by using a vape alone and that in moments where they feel the need to smoke they would turn back to regular cigarettes if vaping is only providing temporary release from nicotine carvings then it is arguable not very effective.

But as I previously mentioned vaping can be personalized so with this in mind it could be taken even further in terms of the strength of the liquids available to help reduce any nicotine cravings that may be experienced. In legal states and as long as you are of legal age you may find that using other products that may be a bit stronger is more effective, for example, THC and CBD vaping products that have recently been produced. If you are looking for more information on this topic then I would urge you to check out a full guide to vaping with the delta 8 strain of thc, for useful information on getting started with vaping THC products.



The biggest pro to vaping would have to be the fact that it is significantly less harmful than traditional cigarettes, it can be personalized to suit your own taste and needs and when used properly can seriously reduce the number of cigarettes you smoke and in some cases allow you to quit completely.


Although vaping is considered to be healthier than normal cigarettes there are some negative sides, vaping is not an exclusive solution with many smokers admitting to relapsing back to normal cigarettes in times where they had a large craving, which would mean that vaping isn’t actually as effective as we once thought

There is also the issue that vaping has been glamourized within our society with many young people turning to vape as a popular trend, using any nicotine product can lead to smoking so there is a real case for vaping leading to traditional cigarettes which I would say is a definite negative.